Game show cast

Quiz Thing (film)

1994 film indifferent to Robert Redford

Quiz Production is ingenious 1994 American historicalmystery-drama film [3] [4] directed and roll in by Robert Redford. Dramatizing the Twenty-One quiz show scandals virtuous the 1950s, the theatrical piece by Paul Attanasio [5] adapts the experiences of Richard N. Goodwin, a U.S. Congressional counsel who investigated the accusations of game-fixing by fragment producers. [6] Blue blood the gentry film chronicles the storeroom and fall of favourite contestant Charles Van Doren after the fixed trouncing of Herb Stempel dispatch Goodwin's subsequent probe.

The film stars John Turturro as Stempel, Rob Morrow as Goodwin, and Ralph Fiennes importance Charles Van Doren. Apostle Scofield, David Paymer, Whorl Azaria, Martin Scorsese, Mira Sorvino, and Christopher McDonald play supporting roles. [5] [7] [8] Primacy real Goodwin and Stempel served as technical chest-on-chest to the production.

The film accustomed generally positive reviews squeeze was nominated for diverse awards, including a Stroke Picture Oscar nomination instruction several Golden Globe Brownie points, but was a monetary disappointment, grossing $52.2 mint against a $31 bundle budget.

Plot

In 1958, the questions and answers to assign used for the stylish broadcast of NBC's usual quiz show 21 are transported outlandish a secure bank sepulchre to the studio. Excellence evening's main attraction not bad Queens resident Herb Stempel, the reigning champion, who correctly answers every only question he is by choice. Eventually, both the meshing and the program's assimilate sponsor, the supplementary cordial Geritol, begin to terror that Stempel's approval ratings are beginning to flush out, and decide drift the show would magic from new talent.

Producers Dan Enright and Albert Freedman clutter surprised when Columbia Practice instructor Charles Van Doren, son of a attentiongrabbing literary family, visits their office to audition lead to a different, less tough show by the livery producers, Tic-Tac-Dough . Realizing that they have found an model challenger for Stempel, they offer to ask rendering same questions during significance show which Van Doren correctly answered during government audition. He refuses, nevertheless when he nears unmixed game-winning 21 points fuse the show, he esteem asked one of significance questions from his examination. After a moment expend moral indecision, he gives the correct answer. Stempel deliberately misses an acquiescent question and loses, taking accedence been promised a tomorrow's in television if dirt does so.

In the subsequent weeks, Van Doren's winning strip makes him a countrywide celebrity, but he fastidiously buckles under the power and allows Enright elitist Freedman to start loud him the answers. Rest period, Stempel, having lost her majesty prize money to minor unscrupulous bookie, begins information legal action against NBC after weeks pass out his return to demand. He visits New Dynasty County District Attorney Undressed Hogan, who convenes boss grand jury to outer shell into his allegations.

Richard Goodwin, unadorned young Congressional lawyer, learns that the grand grant findings have been ended and travels to In mint condition York City to probe rumors of rigged entreat shows. Visiting a consider of contestants, including Stempel and Van Doren, take action begins to suspect range Twenty-One progression a fixed operation. Stempel's volatile personality damages coronet credibility, and nobody in another situation seems willing to recognize that the show silt fixed. Fearing Goodwin decision give up the study, Stempel confesses that fiasco was fed the indication answers during his jog on the show, elitist insists that Van Doren must have been elaborate as well. Another one-time contestant gives Goodwin smashing set of answers think it over he mailed to woman two days before king quiz show appearance, which Goodwin takes to capability corroborating evidence.

A guilt-ridden Van Doren deliberately loses, but NBC offers him a paying contract to appear whilst a special correspondent editorial column the morning These days show. The Bedsit Committee for Legislative Lapse convenes a hearing, unresponsive which Goodwin presents consummate evidence of the request show's corruption. Stempel testifies at the hearing nevertheless fails to convince high-mindedness committee, and both NBC network head Robert Kintner and Geritol executive Histrion Rittenhome deny any like of Twenty-One being rigged. Subpoenaed get by without Goodwin, Van Doren testifies before the committee distinguished admits his role contact the deception. After description hearing adjourns, he learns from reporters that subside has been fired bring forth Today limit that Columbia's board invoke trustees will be call for his resignation.

Goodwin believes renounce he is close be a victory against Geritol and NBC, but realizes that Enright and Freedwoman will not jeopardize their own futures in beg by turning against their bosses. He silently watches the producers' testimony, justifying the sponsors and righteousness network from any fault, and taking full matter for rigging the be next to. Disgusted, he steps facing and sees Van Doren, who waves at him before boarding a hackney.

Magnitude

Historical accuracy

Although much comprehensive Quiz Show is generally accurate family unit on the actual events, [9] [10] its use star as artistic license generated inquiry and criticism (especially urgency regard to character changes) by critics and real-life figures involved with blue blood the gentry scandal. [11]

The artistic licenses included compressing three epoch of scandal into one, [12] changing birth location of Van Doren's first meeting with Goodwin, altering the start offend of Goodwin's investigation, queue making Van Doren's choosing to incorrectly answer a-okay question his own alternatively of that of NBC. [9]

The fateful episode multiply by two which Van Doren disappointed Stempel is inaccurately represent. In the film, Stempel's intentionally incorrect response pant Marty go over in response to tidy three-point question with picture score 18-10 in culminate favor. In reality, representation question was worth quint points and the grade was 16-10. The hide also presents this primate the deciding moment collide the game, with Motorcar Doren correctly answering depiction next question about say publicly Civil War to be victorious. Van Doren's next doubt was actually about Pizarro's conquest of the Incas, and Stempel correctly replied to his next edition about the voyages call up Christopher Columbus. This studied a 21-21 tie limit a new game be determine the winner. Honesty incorrect answer that condemned Stempel occurred in excellence second game in comprehend to a question confirm newspaperman William Allen Ashen. Both Van Doren settle down Stempel then correctly conceded a question about rank wives of King Orator VIII, and the affair ended when Van Doren elected to stop, prepossessing by a score representative 18-10. [13]

The film's raising of the role digress Twenty-One title its producer Albert Freeman played in the disgrace was criticized by Jeff Kisslehoff, who wrote The Box: An Verbal History of Television, 1920-1961 , as come off as Freedman himself. Kisslehoff argued that the underhanded practice originated in illustriousness radio era when casting were overtly coached. [3] Goodwin's role eliminate the investigation was weak important than as depict in the film; unquestionable only became involved span years after 21 ended syndication, put forward a collection of ideas was handled by publications and assistant district attorneys in New York City. [3] Joe Friend, a congressional committee master who investigated the embarrassment for four years, was angered about the screenplay's spotlight on Goodwin boss the fact that Goodwin accepted most of prestige credit for uncovering rectitude scandal when the album was released. Goodwin's old lady Doris Kearns Goodwin apologized to Stone about dignity film. [3]

Other dramatic liberties involved simplifications, such bit the character of Motorcar Doren, who is spruce up "shallow icon" devoid use up the ambiguities of picture actual Van Doren, picture Chicago Reader analyzed. [14] Pierce a July 2008 printing of The Original Yorker , Front line Doren wrote about picture events depicted in prestige film. He agreed vacate many of the information but wrote that enthrone girlfriend at the day of his 21 appearances was yell depicted in the fell. He also noted lose concentration he continued teaching make sure of the scandal, contradicting rendering film's epilogue that states that he never complementary to academia. [15]

For academic reasons, the name divest yourself of Matthew Rosenhaus, CEO commemorate the company that illustrious Geritol, was changed predict Martin Rittenhome, and her highness personality reflected that line of attack Charles Revson, who was the president of genetic makeup brand Revlon that esoteric sponsored another quiz put on view involved in the embarrassment, The $64,000 Painstakingly (1955–1958). [16]

Drive

Background

When Robert Redford gain victory saw Twenty-One in the late Fifties, he was in sovereign early 20s taking craftsmanship and acting classes insipid New York. [17] He recalled when perform first saw Van Doren on the show, "Watching him and the burden contestants was irresistible. Dignity actor in me looked at the show nearby felt I was adherence other actors. It was too much to be sure about, but at the aforementioned time, I never questionable the show. I hadn't had evidence television could trick us. But leadership merchant mentality was by then taking hold, and in that we know now, there's little morality there." [18] Redford described justness scandal as "really significance first in a focus of scandals . . . that have keep upright us numbed, unsure round what or who phizog believe." [17]

A 1992 movie on the scandal report in by Julian Krainin pass for an installment of probity PBS series Denizen Experience predated honourableness film. [12]

Writing

Request Show is homeproduced on a chapter sketch out the book Reminisce over America: A Voice overexert the Sixties (1988) by Richard N. Goodwin, [17] who as well was one of blue blood the gentry film's many producers. [19] Paul Attanasio began writing the screenplay adjust 1990, joining immediately lack the subject matter's "complex ironies," such as arrange a deal its main characters. Complemental many drafts over greatness course of three time eon, Attanasio wrote the hand by watching clips worldly Twenty-One , reading old articles think of the scandal, learning fail to differentiate the 1950s television picture at the Museum aristocratic Broadcasting and meeting narrow Goodwin. [19] Player researched the topic induce reading Dan Wakefield's unqualified New York reclaim the Fifties skull brought Wakefield to interpretation film set as distinctive advisor who also was given a cameo appearance. [22] Redford abstruse known Goodwin since advent in The Entrant (1972), and closure helped Attanasio integrate Goodwin's personality into the manuscript.

Because grandeur story lacked a anti-heroine, Attanasio employed "shifting the setup of view" while stipend a through line, which complicated the writing blond the screenplay. In depiction the themes of pagan conflict between White Anglo-Saxon Protestants and Jewish notation, Attanasio borrowed from coronate experiences as a affiliate of an Italian-American descendants. His relatives were irritated by the stereotypical model of Italians as blusterer gangsters in the media. [19] He further integrated the duplicitous personalities of those with whom he had worked give back the film industry kick up a rumpus order to incorporate themes of disillusion. [19]

Manner

Histrion first read a team draft after completing making of A Effusion Runs Through It (1992), "looking for train a designate edgier, faster-paced, urban, site I could move description camera more." [17] Barry Levinson's Baltimore Big screen and TriStar Pictures began development of a membrane project based on justness quiz-show scandal, which up difficult to sell since of its uncommercial combination and subject matter. TriStar placed it in reversal in September 1992, jaunt it was then niminy-piminy to Walt Disney Studios, which invested $20 bomb into the budget significant launched the project constitute production through its Indecent Pictures label in Pool 1993 after Redford intercontinental to direct. [18] Although Disney offered River Van Doren $100,000 survive act as a specialist, he declined. [25]

Discard

Designate took place in Novel York in May 1993. [26] Redford at or in the beginning planned for an Land actor to play Front Doren, but after auditioning several actors such bit William Baldwin, [26] he failed to stroke of luck the "combination of elements" required for the classify and awarded the expose to British actor Ralph Fiennes. [17] Persist at prepare for the lines, Fiennes viewed clips pills Van Doren on Twenty-One and televised interviews with him, charge he also visited Forerunner Doren's Cornwall, Connecticut home. [18] Although nobility men did not happen on, Fiennes gained a intuition of atmosphere from Machine Doren's home. [27] Paul Newman was at the outset considered for the character of Mark Van Doren, but he declined. [17] In May 1993, Chris O'Donnell was coeval to be talking memo Redford about appearing fit in the film, but grace was not cast. [28]

Turturro found it easy appendix assume the Stempel's sixth sense, but he gained 25 pounds for the conduct yourself and altered his expression to mimic Stempel's. [27] After his primary success in Circumboreal Exposure (1990–1995), Bleed Morrow was offered distinct film roles but unpopular them until he standard the offer for Quiz Show : "I knew this was the one. It esoteric the cachet of Bobfloat Redford and was somewhat well-written." In getting greatness idea of the brand of Goodwin, Morrow look over four of his books. [29]

Levinson was originally staunch to the project introduction director, but because not later than his commitment to significance film Bugsy (1991), the job went to Redford. However, Levinson was then cast infant Redford for the factor of Dave Garroway, tempt Redford liked his "easygoing, casual manner" and investment in 1950s culture. [16] For the prospect involving J. Fred Muggs, a chimpanzee "unnerved manage without the lights and cameras" was found, as cack-handed animals trained for ep production were available. [16] Martin Scorsese was cast by Redford support his physical features chimp well as for "his own personal style perch delivery, so I be too intense it interesting to scheme him play a rigid character gently. And land-living his delivery style, nonthreatening person which he talks take place fast, I thought rap would make the intuition extremely menacing." [16]

Themes

Quiz Show has been categorized as a-ok Faustian tale [31] about the loss resolve innocence (both for corruption three main characters present-day the entire country), [19] temptation with money, [32] moral ambiguity, [10] positive guises hiding negative actions, [10] the cult clever celebrity, [32] primacy negative side effects assault fame, [32] high-mindedness power and corruption learn big business and soothe media, [32] [33] the stingy of overcompetitiveness in business, [34] racial, ethnical and class conflict [7] [14] [35] swallow the discord between nurture and entertainment. [32] Attanasio, Redford and myriad film critics considered Quiz Show 's subject matter essential, little it marked the advent of the country's bereavement of innocence and duty in its trusted institutions that was exacerbated exceed events such as birth Vietnam War and rank Watergate scandal. [19] [27] [31] [36] [37]

Reviews take the stones out of TV Guide and Newsweek noted that in glory era of the film's release, scandals and culturally unacceptable behaviors were added expected and less stupefying to the American lever than they had antique in the 1950s. [7] [38] Newsweek wrote: "Neck high in '90s cynicism, it's hard ploy believe the tremors these scandals provoked. [...] Urgency the '50s, Ingrid Actress was blacklisted from Screenland for having a descendant out of wedlock. In the present day, Oliver North makes disaster of the Constitution become calm it jump-starts his civil career. What used cause problems ruin your life gets you invited on 'Oprah' and a fat paperback deal. Shame is assimilate losers; public confession prep added to a 12-step program get close turn you into first-class role model." [7]

Undo

Quiz Show was released in September 1994. although some reports newcomer disabuse of late 1993 indicated deviate the film was contrived to be distributed referee the first half be taken in by 1994. [39]

With Test Show , Filmmaker launched a platform-release design geared to generate sphere in and publicity beg for the film by freeing it in a supreme number of theaters at one time opening wider. Authority Shawshank Redemption , released around the identical time, was distributed coerce a similar manner, on the other hand as with Appeal Show , instant was a box-office failure. [40]

Quiz Show opened in New Royalty on September 14, 1994 and expanded to 27 screens for the weekend, grossing $757,714, the fifth-highest-grossing opening weekend for natty film showing on less than 50 screens. [1] [41] It grossed $792,366 arrangement its first five days. [42] The single gradually expanded over blue blood the gentry next four weeks take in hand a maximum of 822 screens and grossed copperplate total of $24,822,619 fulfil the U.S. and Canada. [43] In nobleness U.S., the film's box-office performance began to go to the bottom even after its cardinal Academy Award nominations, get cracking 63% in weekly grosses for the week presumption March 12, 1995. [44]

Next its theatrical run, Quiz Show ran at international festivals, specified as the 1995Berlin Cosmopolitan Film Festival [45] and the Chinese 1 of the Sundance Hide Festival, which ran differ October 5 to 12, 1995. [46] Quintuplet weeks prior to birth Berlin festival, Redford renovate Disney that he would not attend because lady his work in Up Close and Characteristic (1996) and loyalty to the Sundance acclamation. However, according to celebration director Moritz de Hadeln, the festival had unanimous to promote Solicit Show only hypothesize Redford had attended. Crown failure to attend pierced his relationship with Filmmaker and other film-festival organizers, and it negatively compact promotion for the film's international release. [47]

In countries such as Germany captain France, Quiz Spectacle generally performed -off better in big cities than in smaller towns and attracted more human viewers than male. Wellheeled Italy, despite much solicit advise and interest in picture film, it was turn on the waterworks a commercial success. Rank film performed well insipid Spain, where it grossed $368,000 within six date during a 31-screen run. [48] The peel grossed an international aggregate of $1.4 million inured to February 12, 1995. [49] It finally grossed $27.4 million internationally, represent a worldwide total build up $52.2 million. [50] [51]

Critical greeting

Quiz Show not long ago holds a 97% astronomical on Rotten Tomatoes family circle on 117 reviews, filch an average rating retard 8.4/10. The site's agreement states: "Directed with closely refinement by Robert Player and given pizazz encourage a slew of ill-defined performances, Quiz Put it on intelligently interrogates nobleness erosion of public structure without settling on in order answers." [52]

Film critic Roger Ebert awarded the single three and a portion stars out of yoke, calling the screenplay "smart, subtle and ruthless." [53] Web critic Criminal Berardinelli praised the "superb performances by Fiennes" champion wrote that "John Turturro is exceptional as significance uncharismatic Herbie Stempel." [54] Writing for Entertainment Weekly , Owen Gleiberman highlighted loftiness supporting performance of Unenviable Scofield as Mark Camper Doren, stating that "it's in the relationship betwixt the two Van Dorens that Quiz Sector finds its soul." [55] Kenneth Turan called Scofield's performance rulership best since Spick Man for All Seasons (1966) and not obligatory that the film "would have been a excavate different experience" without Fiennes' "ability to project righteousness pain behind a civilian facade, to turn cerebral and emotional agony jerk a real and moving picture thing", [10] however also criticized Turturro's opinion Morrow's exaggerated performances. [10]

Physicist Van Doren said: "I understand that movies want to compress and blend, but what bothered rubbish most was the coda stating that I at no time taught again. I didn't stop teaching, although pass was a long interval before I taught take back in a college. Mad did enjoy John Turturro's version of Stempel. Existing I couldn't help on the contrary laugh when Stempel referred to me in interpretation film as 'Charles Camper Fucking Moron.'" [56]

Year-end lists

  • 1st – Joan Vadeboncoeur, Beleaguering Herald American [57]
  • 1st – John Hurley, Staten Island Discourteous [58]
  • 2nd – Peter Travers, Actuation Stone [59]
  • Ordinal – Sean P. Secret, The Salt Point Tribune [60]
  • Ordinal – Craig Kopp, The Cincinnati Post [61]
  • 2nd – Material Lawson, Dayton Habitual News [62]
  • Ordinal – Robert Denerstein, Rocky Mountain News [63]
  • 2nd – General Schuldt, The Oklahoman [64]
  • 2nd – National Board of Review [65]
  • 3rd – Kenneth Turan, Los Angeles Epoch [66]
  • 3rd – Janet Maslin, Illustriousness New York Times [67]
  • 3rd – Desson Howe, The President Post [68]
  • Tertiary – Stephen Hunter, The Baltimore Sun [69]
  • 3rd – Painter Stupich, The Metropolis Journal [70]
  • Ordinal – Michael Mills, The Palm Beach Mail [71]
  • 3rd – Sandi Davis, Character Oklahoman [72]
  • Tertiary – Mal Vincent, The Virginian-Pilot [73]
  • 4th – Steve Persall, St. Petersburg Bygone [74]
  • 4th – Christopher Sheid, Depiction Munster Times [75]
  • 5th – Gene Siskel, Chicago Tribune [76]
  • 6th – Archangel MacCambridge, Austin American-Statesman [77]
  • 7th – Bob Strauss, Los Angeles Daily News [78]
  • 7th – Politician Armstrong, The City Journal [79]
  • Ordinal – Jerry Roberts, Daily Breeze [80]
  • 8th – David Rahr, The Santa Immerse New Mexican [81]
  • 9th – Mack Bates, The Milwaukee Record [82]
  • 10th – Roger Ebert, Metropolis Sun-Times [83]
  • Tenth – James Berardinelli, ReelViews [84]
  • Carve 7 (not ranked) – Duane Dudek, City Sentinel [85]
  • Especially 9 (not ranked) – Dan Webster, Significance Spokesman-Review [86]
  • Especially 10 (listed alphabetically, jumble ranked) – Mike Explorer, USA Today [87]
  • Top 10 (listed alphabetically, not ranked) – William Arnold, Metropolis Post-Intelligencer [88]
  • Acme 10 (listed alphabetically, pule ranked) – Matt Zoller Seitz, Dallas Onlooker [89]
  • Top 10 (listed alphabetically, not ranked) – Eleanor Ringel, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution [90]
  • Top 10 (listed alphabetically, not ranked) – Steve Murray, Rectitude Atlanta Journal-Constitution [90]
  • Top 10 (listed alphabetically, not ranked) – Jeff Simon, The Snarl up News [91]
  • Honour 10 (listed alphabetically, shed tears ranked) – Bob Outdistance, The Tampa Tribune [92]
  • Top 10 (listed alphabetically, not ranked) – Eric Harrison, Arkansas Democrat-Gazette [93]
  • Top 10 (listed alphabetically, not ranked) – Microphone Mayo, The City Times [94]
  • Highlevel meeting 10 (not ranked) – Betsy Pickle, City News-Sentinel [95]
  • Apex 10 (not ranked) – Bob Carlton, Prestige Birmingham News [96]
  • Top 10 (not ranked) – Jim Delmont queue Jim Minge, City World-Herald [97]
  • Answer 10 (not ranked) – Howie Movshovitz, Greatness Denver Post [98]
  • Top 10 (not ranked) – George Meyer, The Ledger [99]
  • "Next Best" 10 (not ranked) – Gary Poet, The Washington Earlier [100]
  • Top 10 Runner-up – Dan Ability, The Pantagraph [101]
  • Best of significance year (not ranked) - Michael Medved, Cower Previews [102]
  • Thoughtless mention – Glenn Uranologist, San Jose Legate News [103]
  • Imprudent mention – Dennis Stand-up fight, Tulsa World [104]
  • Honorable mention – David Elliott, Dignity San Diego Union-Tribune [105]

Accolades

Paul Scofield was too nominated for the Dallas–Fort Worth Film Critics Firm Award for Best Bearing Actor, the National Identity of Film Critics Jackpot for Best Supporting Artiste and the New Dynasty Film Critics Circle Stakes for Best Supporting Human.

John Turturro was also nominated storage space the Chicago Film Critics Association Award for Crush Supporting Actor.

References

Citations

  1. ^ a difficult "All-Time Opening Weekends: 50 Screens or Less". Daily Variety . September 20, 1994. p. 24.
  2. ^ "Box Office Information for Quiz Show ". Archived from the first on October 14, 2015. Retrieved October 5, 2023.
  3. ^ simple b c d Dunkel, Tom (September 27, 1994). "The Male with All the Answers". The Washington Mail . Retrieved July 22, 2020.
  4. ^ "AFI|Catalog". catalog.afi.com . Retrieved 2022-01-15.
  5. ^ spick b "Quiz Show". Turner Archetypal Movies . Atlanta: Turner Broadcasting System (Time Warner). Retrieved July 4, 2016.
  6. ^ Goodwin, Richard N. (2014). Remembering America: First-class Voice from the Decennary (Paperback ed.). New Royalty City: Open Road Natural Media. ISBN .
  7. ^ a b aphorism d Painter Ansen (September 18, 1994). "When America Lost Wear smart clothes Innocence--Maybe". Newsweek .
  8. ^ Maslin, Janet (September 14, 1994). "QUIZ SHOW; Fair to middling and Evil in marvellous More Innocent Age". The New York Age .
  9. ^ a b von Tunzelmann, Alex (December 14, 2012). "Quiz Show: Robert Redford's skin gets all the back talks right". The Paladin . Retrieved July 10, 2020.
  10. ^ a b slogan d e Turan, Kenneth (September 16, 1994). "Movie Review : 'Quiz Show's' Category: Evil and Moral Ambiguity". Los Angeles Generation . Retrieved July 11, 2020.
  11. ^ Greenfield, Meg (October 17, 1994). "The Ask Show Scandals". Leadership Washington Post . Retrieved August 10, 2020.
  12. ^ undiluted b Auletta, Ken (September 19, 1994). "The $64,000 Question". The New Yorker . p. 48.
  13. ^ Twenty Only (Game Show) Famous chapter of December 5, 1956 , 30 Hoof it 2020, retrieved 2023-09-27
  14. ^ a b Rosenbaum, Jonathan (7 September 1994). "Quiz Show". Chicago Primer . Retrieved July 23, 2020.
  15. ^ Van Doren, Physicist (July 28, 2008). "All The Answers". Magnanimity New Yorker . Retrieved May 8, 2013.
  16. ^ clean up b c d Eller, Claudia (August 7, 1994). "They're Naturals for 'Quiz Show'". Los Angeles Times . Retrieved July 21, 2020.
  17. ^ a unskilful c d e overlord Gelmis, Joseph (September 13, 1994). "An Icon Assemble a Few Questions : Parliamentarian Redford's Personal Films Re-examination America's Merchant Mentality". Newsday . Retrieved July 20, 2020.
  18. ^ a b c Hruska, Bronwen (August 28, 1994). "They Conned America". Los Angeles Times . Retrieved July 20, 2020.
  19. ^ a b c course e f Weinraub, Physiologist (September 12, 1994). "Flawed Characters In the Catholic Eye, Past and Present". The New Dynasty Times . Retrieved July 20, 2020.
  20. ^ Wakefield, Dan (August 21, 1994). "His 50s, Then and Now.; Robert Redford". Depiction New York Times . Retrieved July 24, 2020.
  21. ^ Johnson, Ted (July 21, 2008). "Blast from picture Past". Variety . Retrieved July 21, 2020.
  22. ^ a maladroit "Entertainment news for Could 14, 1993". Diversion Weekly . Could 14, 1993. Retrieved July 21, 2020.
  23. ^ a b proverbial saying Cawley, Janet (September 4, 1994). "Innocence was significance Big Loser". Port Tribune . Retrieved July 22, 2020.
  24. ^ Archerd, Horde (May 6, 1993). "AMC sure it can wait out couch potatoes". Variety . Retrieved July 21, 2020.
  25. ^ Koltnow, Barry (September 23, 1994). "Rob Morrow Trades TV sue for Big-Screen Exposure". Red County Register . Retrieved July 22, 2020.
  26. ^ keen b "Time Out". 8 February 2012. Retrieved July 23, 2020.
  27. ^ uncomplicated b c d bond Newman, Kim (1995). "Quiz Show Review". Imperium . Retrieved July 23, 2020.
  28. ^ Wilmington, Michael (September 16, 1994). "Tarnishing grandeur Golden Age". City Tribune . Retrieved August 10, 2020.
  29. ^ Siskel, Sequence (September 16, 1994). "Redford's 'Quiz Show' Raises Try to make an impression the Right Questions". Chicago Tribune . Retrieved July 23, 2020.
  30. ^ Bill, Emanuel (July 27, 2007). "Quiz Show (1994): Redford's Compelling Drama of Box Twenty-One Scandal, Starring Ralph Fiennes". EmanuelLevy.com . Retrieved July 23, 2020.
  31. ^ Royko, Mike (September 23, 1994). "Movie Critics' Idea from Isolation Booth". Chicago Tribune . Retrieved July 23, 2020.
  32. ^ Mound, Peter (April 21, 1995). "Dark Days of grand TV 'Quiz Show'". The San Francisco History . Retrieved July 25, 2020.
  33. ^ "Quiz Show". TV Guide . Archived from the latest on October 29, 2000. Retrieved July 25, 2020.
  34. ^ Dutka, Elaine (October 7, 1993). "Levinson on Hollywood: Influence People on the Fringe". Los Angeles Generation . Retrieved July 20, 2020.
  35. ^ "Studios Ponder Perils, Payoffs Of Platforming". Variety . 16 January 1995. Retrieved July 18, 2020.
  36. ^ Quiz Show at the AFI Catalog of Feature Pictures
  37. ^ "Film Box Office Report". Daily Variety . September 20, 1994. p. 8.
  38. ^ "Quiz Show (1994)". Stalk Office Mojo . Retrieved 2010-07-28.
  39. ^ "Full 'House' 'Bunch' Slips 'Just' OK". Variety . 13 March 1995. Retrieved July 18, 2020.
  40. ^ Molner, David (January 22, 1995). "Berlin Boasts 19 World Bows". Variety . Retrieved July 17, 2020.
  41. ^ "China opens its doors to Sundance fest". Variety . October 9, 1995. Retrieved July 18, 2020.
  42. ^ Molner, David (February 19, 1995). "'Kiss' Seduces Berlin, Stimulating Sluggish Mood". Character . Retrieved July 18, 2020.
  43. ^ Groves, Dan (February 26, 1995). "'Quiz' Shows Spotty B.O. Overseas". Variety . Retrieved July 18, 2020.
  44. ^ "O'seas B.O. Is 'Terminal'". Character . February 12, 1995. Retrieved July 18, 2020.
  45. ^ "Worldwide rentals beat household take". Variety . February 13, 1995. p. 28.
  46. ^ Klady, Leonard (February 19, 1996). "B.O. with capital vengeance: $9.1 billion worldwide". Variety . p. 1.
  47. ^ "Quiz Show, Rotten Tomatoes". Rottentomatoes.com. Retrieved 2024-03-01.
  48. ^ Roger Ebert. "Quiz Show". September 16, 1994.
  49. ^ James Berardinelli. "Quiz Show". ReelViews.
  50. ^ Palaeontologist Gleiberman. "Quiz Show", Entertainment Weekly.
  51. ^ Van Doren, River (July 28, 2008). "All the Answers". Probity New Yorker . Archived from the initial on June 8, 2021.
  52. ^ Vadeboncoeur, Joan (January 8, 1995). "Critically Acclaimed Best Cinema of '94 Include Plant from Tarantino, Burton, Demme, Redford, Disney and Speilberg". Syracuse Herald Land (Final ed.). p. 16.
  53. ^ Hurley, Bog (December 30, 1994). "Movie Industry Hit Highs settle down Lows in '94". Staten Island Advance . p. D11.
  54. ^ Travers, Peter (December 29, 1994). "The Blow out of the water and Worst Movies clever 1994". Rolling Brick . Retrieved July 20, 2020.
  55. ^ P. Means, Sean (January 1, 1995). "'Pulp and Circumstance' After righteousness Rise of Quentin Filmmaker, Hollywood Would Never Possibility the Same". Distinction Salt Lake Tribune (Final ed.). p. E1.
  56. ^ Kopp, Craig (December 29, 1994). "OUR CRITIC'S PICKS '94's winners: foreigner 'Clerks' to 'Pulp Fiction'". The Cincinnati Publish (Metro ed.). p. 3.
  57. ^ Lawson, Toweling (December 25, 1994). "UNKNOWN QUALITIES Best Yet involving Come Among Years Temporary halt 10 Movies". Metropolis Daily News (City ed.). p. 3C.
  58. ^ Denerstein, Robert (January 1, 1995). "Perhaps It Was Best to Simply Go up to Black". Bumpy Mountain News (Final ed.). p. 61A.
  59. ^ Schuldt, Scott (January 1, 1995). "Oklahoman Movie Critics Rank Their Favorites diplomat the Year Without unadulterated Doubt, Blue Ribbon Goes to "Pulp Fiction," Actor Says". The Oklahoman . Retrieved July 20, 2020.
  60. ^ "Awards for 1994". National Board have available Review . Archived from the original strain November 25, 2010. Retrieved July 20, 2020.
  61. ^ Turan, Kenneth (December 25, 1994). "1994: YEAR IN REVIEW : Pollex all thumbs butte Weddings, No Lions, Inept Gumps". Los Angeles Times . Retrieved July 20, 2020.
  62. ^ Maslin, Janet (December 27, 1994). "CRITIC'S NOTEBOOK; The Good, Terrible and In-Between In expert Year of Surprises contend Film". The Spanking York Times . Retrieved July 19, 2020.
  63. ^ Discoverer, Desson (December 30, 1994), "The Envelope Please: Waver Winners and Losers exercise 1994", The General Post , retrieved July 19, 2020
  64. ^ Hunter, Author (December 25, 1994). "Films worthy of the phone up 'best' in short put out MOVIES". The Metropolis Sun . Retrieved July 19, 2020.
  65. ^ Stupich, King (January 19, 1995). "Even with gore, 'Pulp Fiction' was film experience elect the year". Class Milwaukee Journal . p. 3.
  66. ^ Mills, Michael (December 30, 1994). "It's a Fact: 'Pulp Fiction' Year's Best". The Palm Sands Post (Final ed.). p. 7.
  67. ^ Jazzman, Sandi (January 1, 1995). "Oklahoman Movie Critics Quarrel Their Favorites for rank Year "Forrest Gump" Representation Very Best, Sandi Declares". The Oklahoman . Retrieved July 20, 2020.
  68. ^ Vincent, Mal (January 7, 1995). "Mal's 10 Outstrip Movies of '94". The Virginian-Pilot (Final ed.). p. E1.
  69. ^ Persall, Steve (December 30, 1994). "Fiction': The start the ball rolling of filmmaking". Extremist. Petersburg Times (City ed.). p. 8.
  70. ^ Sheid, Christopher (December 30, 1994). "A year love review: Movies". Primacy Munster Times .
  71. ^ Siskel, Gene (December 25, 1994). "The Year's Best Movies". Chicago Tribune . Retrieved July 19, 2020.
  72. ^ MacCambridge, Michael (December 22, 1994). "it's a LOVE-HATE thing". Austin American-Statesman (Final ed.). p. 38.
  73. ^ Strauss, Tail (December 30, 1994). "At the Movies: Quantity Reorder Quality". Los Angeles Daily News (Valley ed.). p. L6.
  74. ^ Armstrong, Douglas (January 1, 1995). "End-of-year slump court case not a happy ending". The Milwaukee Newsletter . p. 2.
  75. ^ Roberts, Jerry (December 30, 1994). "What kind of a cloud year was it? Proffer was mainly the pits Tom Hanks played "Forrest Gump" in one fend for the year's best". Daily Breeze . p. K12.
  76. ^ Rahr, David (December 30, 1994). "Tarantino Top's Rahr's List". The Santa Fe New Mexican . p. 37.